Tourism is supposed to help cities thrive. But in places like Barcelona, Venice, and Amsterdam, local governments are doing the opposite of what you’d expect—they’re removing or limiting popular tourist attractions. It sounds counterintuitive, but behind these moves is a growing global issue: too much tourism.
So why would a city sabotage its tourism appeal? The answer lies in the tension between money, culture, and quality of life.
Overtourism Is a Real Problem
When millions of people flock to the same few places year after year, things start to break down. Infrastructure gets overwhelmed. Housing prices spike. Local businesses get replaced by souvenir shops. And residents? Many say they feel like strangers in their neighborhoods.
Take Venice, for example. The city has long been overwhelmed by cruise ships and day-trippers who crowd the canals but spend very little money locally. As a result, Venice has started charging entrance fees, limiting short-term rentals, and even rerouting ships away from its historic center.
This isn’t anti-tourism—it’s survival.
When Popularity Kills Authenticity
Many attractions lose their original meaning once tourism takes over. Markets turn into Instagram backdrops. Sacred temples get trampled. Street art becomes commodified. Cities like Kyoto, which once welcomed tourists warmly, now plead for visitors to respect boundaries, traditions, and space.
When tourists outnumber residents, authenticity becomes staged. To reclaim control, some cities have removed or restricted access to attractions altogether—turning the spotlight back on local life rather than photo ops.
The Push for Sustainable Tourism
Removing attractions isn’t about being unwelcoming. It’s about redefining the tourism experience to be more sustainable—for the city, its people, and even the planet.
Amsterdam, for instance, has removed the iconic “I AMSTERDAM” sign because it attracted massive crowds, leading to congestion and complaints. They’ve also limited new hotel construction, shut down over-touristed areas of the red-light district, and cracked down on party tourism.
The message? Quality over quantity.
Shifting the Focus to Locals
Instead of serving visitors, some cities are turning their attention back to the people who live there. That means fewer budget hostels and more affordable housing. Fewer selfie spots and more green spaces. Some even encourage “slow tourism”—inviting guests to spend more time, spend more money locally, and respect local rhythms.
By taking down or restricting major attractions, city planners are sending a clear signal: these places are homes, not theme parks.
Not Every Attraction Should Last Forever
Some cities also remove tourist attractions because they no longer reflect modern values. Statues, colonial buildings, or outdated exhibits can become flashpoints for controversy. Removing them may be a way to make space for new, inclusive narratives.
Others are dismantled due to wear and tear, environmental risks, or evolving priorities. Attractions aren’t sacred—they’re tools. And sometimes, tools wear out their usefulness.
Final Thoughts
Tourism isn’t dying—it’s evolving. Cities aren’t trying to shut the door on visitors. They’re trying to strike a balance between welcoming the world and protecting their own identity.
So next time you see a famous spot removed or restricted, remember: it might be a sign of a city trying to save itself—not turn you away.
Want more insights on travel trends, global culture, and what tourists never get told?
Check out Wizforg.com for deeper stories—and subscribe to our YouTube channel for fast, fascinating explainers on the strange rules and realities of travel.
